How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death The Debate on Spanking is Dead

You are searching about How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death, today we will share with you article about How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death is useful to you.

The Debate on Spanking is Dead

I feel it is important to make it very clear to all and sundry concerned that the fart debate in the scientific and academic communities is dead, and has been for several years. The most important indicator of this development is demonstrated by the fact that almost every professional organization in the United States and Canada concerned with the care and treatment of children, has taken a public stance against the practice of puspading.

Based on the overwhelming accumulation of research conducted over the past 50+ years linking spanking to a number of risk factors, the professional consensus against this practice has grown to global proportions… even to the extent that 52 countries have legalized total spanking bans. … including countries like Sweden, Finland, Austria, Norway, Croatia, Denmark, Hungary, Israel, Cyprus, Netherlands, Bulgaria, Germany, Latvia, Iceland, Romania, Greece, New Zealand, Austria, Venezuela, Spain, Portugal , Chile , Uruguay, Brazil, France, and Ukraine… with Italy, South Africa, Scotland, Canada, and Ireland apparently in the process of following. It should also be noted that every industrialized country in the world except the United States has instituted total bans on corporal punishment in schools. The evidence is in, and the evidence found against the practice of beating in a convincingly conclusive way.

Just as one might find supportive views of farting promoted (typically) on websites sponsored by fundamentalist Christian sects, so one might find supportive views promoting homophobia, racism, misogyny and other “hate” propaganda. Due to the fact that the real agendas of these websites are often deceptively hidden by organizational titles such as, “Family Council”, “People’s Choice”, “Rights and Freedoms”, etc., people are forced to exercise a very prudent discernment of the information available on the internet. Some netizens have had to learn the hard way that the internet abounds with convincing presentations of “facts and figures” that may prove to represent nothing more than religious, political or philosophical attempts to spread self-serving disinformation.

Having spent over 40 years examining/evaluating the research on this topic of pushing children, I can state with a high degree of confidence that there has never been a peer-reviewed study that has been able to establish the effectiveness of spanking as a means of long-term behavior modification; as an effective teaching modality; as an effective punishment; or as a means of encouraging self-discipline. Nor were research findings published in peer-reviewed professional journals that served to refute previous research.

This previous research found that battering is associated with risk for undesirable emotional consequences; risk for physical injury; risk of counterproductive behavioral outcomes; risk for the beginning of dependence on external controls; and a tendency toward authority-directed behavior. Moreover, there has never been research data produced finding that hitting carries no risk to the quality of the parent-child relationship (and I should add that conservative, pro-groping editorial reviews of previous research findings do not constitute real research, as is sometimes claimed to be the case).

However, there are some whippersnappers who will find reasons to reject, ignore or discount the research findings of field experimental studies related to the Social Sciences. Well, it’s these people in particular that I’d like to address about alarming new research findings that represent the most severe consequences of physical punishment yet discovered…doing so in the form of documented scientific evidence*.

These revelations came through studies in brain research provided CAT SCAN images showing an abnormal lack of brain development (within the part of the brain responsible for emotional functioning) in children who were subjected to beatings as a punitive measure. For the sake of sample homogeneity, the researchers selected subjects for their study who were categorized as “abused” children. Common sense tells us that this does not eliminate the possibility of a lesser degree of brain damage occurring to battered children who are subjected to a lesser degree of non-harmful violence.

In other words, it would be ridiculous to assume that a child must first suffer bruises, cuts or bruises (or other injuries) before brain damage can occur as a result of the physical punishments. Rather, it is much more logical to deduce that acts of physical aggression towards young children can disrupt or prevent the optimal conditions necessary to facilitate a normal process of healthy brain development.

As far as I’m concerned, this new field of research (apparently not yet freely available on the internet) represents the most compelling, undeniable reason yet discovered for persuading parents to stop (or never start) hitting their children as punishment. to measure And I hope any pro-palpists reading this feel the same way. It is hard to imagine any parent who would be willing to treat their child in a way that could carry even a remote risk of causing some brain damage to their child.

But, having said all that, we really shouldn’t need an investigation to end the practice of child-beating any more than we needed an investigation to end the practice of wife-beating. As a society, it did not take research findings to convince us of the harmful effects associated with the practice of physically punishing wives.

Instead, when society reached the point of no longer willing to give social tolerance to the tradition of husbands physically disciplining their wives, our decision to do so was based on our advancement socially into the higher morality of greater humanity. Perhaps, our next step forward in progression should come by deciding to begin recognizing children as also deserving of those same protections from being beaten in a punitive manner.

We no longer see any adult members of our society remaining outside the jurisdiction of the protective laws once enjoyed by only the more privileged and “merited” (namely white men who made the laws), regardless of race, gender, religion, ethnicity. , or sexual orientation. None of our adult citizens remains legally unprotected from being violated by harassment, threats, defamation, discrimination or being victimized by violence in any degree or form.

So, given our heritage of giving greater humanity to those of lower social status by welcoming them as our equals in the eyes of the law (in terms of violent treatment), would it be so out of character for us to also shield the younger, weaker members of our society allowing them to join those of us already sharing in the safety and comfort of security that is provided under the umbrella of legal protections against violence?

Bringing our little ones into the fold really doesn’t seem all that magnanimous when we remember that we were already willing to share the shelter of our umbrella of Assault Laws with even the toughest of tough adult criminals. After all, children are the very last segment of our common human collective who continue to remain fair game to be subjected to acts of physical aggression.

We show a strange sense of priorities when we don’t allow the prison guard to break out a paddle and start slapping the disobedient buttocks of a sociopathic death row inmate who kills for the rush it gives him, yet we find ourselves helpless. , defenseless young children as worthy of such treatment.

In fact, we define corporal punishment of prison inmates as ‘Cruel and Unusual Punishment’, ‘Guard Brutality’ or ‘Aggravated Assault’. And, if the physical punishments were repeated as a routine punishment measure, such treatment of prisoners would fall under the definition of “Torture”.

Why would a murderous prisoner be less subject to physical discipline than a helpless 3-year-old child?

Logically, morally, humanely and scientifically, the fart debate is dead…except for those who would oppose further social progress.

As we evolve as a society, we must remember that historically there was a time when it was acceptable to legally own other people; a time when the mentally ill were generally considered to be possessed by evil spirits; a time when men legally shot each other in official duels; a time when public hangings were attended as a family outing complete with picnic basket; a time when public floggings were considered an acceptable punishment; a time when it was gentlemen’s agreement that husbands should not hit their wives with a switch that was “bigger round than your thumb” (which later became known as “the rule of thumb”); and there was a time when there were no laws against parents severely beating their children (killing children was unacceptable, of course, but occasional accidental maiming as a result of disciplinary measures was tolerated).

Obviously, we no longer allow these penalties. The time has come for us to further increase our level of social sophistication by coming to a general consensus that any degree of physical punishment used against children is as socially unacceptable and abhorrent as those past violent behaviors we have chosen to put behind us.

Video about How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death

You can see more content about How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death on our youtube channel: Click Here

Question about How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death

If you have any questions about How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!

The article How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!

Rate Articles How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death

Rate: 4-5 stars
Ratings: 3802
Views: 84868800

Search keywords How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death

How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death
way How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death
tutorial How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death
How Do I Tell My 3 Year Old About Death free
#Debate #Spanking #Dead

Source: https://ezinearticles.com/?The-Debate-on-Spanking-is-Dead&id=611411

Related Posts

default-image-feature

Refrigerator 30 Years Old Works Well Should Buy New One How To Decant a Bottle of Wine

You are searching about Refrigerator 30 Years Old Works Well Should Buy New One, today we will share with you article about Refrigerator 30 Years Old Works…

default-image-feature

How Do I Teach My 3 Year Old To Talk Tim Sales – My Love-Hate Relationship With the First Class MLM Expert

You are searching about How Do I Teach My 3 Year Old To Talk, today we will share with you article about How Do I Teach My…

default-image-feature

Reflect On Death Of Old Joy Of New Life Children Can Dreams Help Heal Your Grief?

You are searching about Reflect On Death Of Old Joy Of New Life Children, today we will share with you article about Reflect On Death Of Old…

default-image-feature

How To Teach My 3 Year Old To Make Friends 3 Easy Ways to Change Your Child’s Behavior

You are searching about How To Teach My 3 Year Old To Make Friends, today we will share with you article about How To Teach My 3…

default-image-feature

Refers To Learning New Roles As Old Ones Wear Out The Heart of Education is the Student’s Learning – The Library and the Librarian

You are searching about Refers To Learning New Roles As Old Ones Wear Out, today we will share with you article about Refers To Learning New Roles…

default-image-feature

How Do I Teach My 3 Year Old To Listen Music Develops The Child Brain

You are searching about How Do I Teach My 3 Year Old To Listen, today we will share with you article about How Do I Teach My…